Chilled-out fish: antidepressants in waterways impacts animal behaviour

FIsh bowl.png
Monash University scientists are researching how fish are affected by pharmaceutical pollution. (Picture: Bob Wong Lab)

Medications excreted by humans are flushed into the sewerage network, with many bypassing wastewater treatment and flowing into rivers and bays.

Bob Wong.jpg
Behavioural Ecologist Bob Wong (Picture: Monash University)

Associate Professor Bob Wong, Deputy Head of the School of Biological Sciences at Monash University, leads a team of researchers investigating animal reproductive behaviour and the impacts of environmental change on behaviour and evolution.

Approximately 600 of 5000 commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals are found in waterways worldwide, Associate Professor Wong said.

“A lot of these medications end up in the environment and we know they can have profound impacts,” he said.

A recent publication by PhD student, Jake Martin, demonstrated a link in mosquitofish between lessened responses to predators and exposure to the widely-prescribed antidepressant fluoxetine, marketed as Prozac.

Pharmaceutical Pollution.png

When Mr Martin exposed fish to the drug at realistic pollutant levels, the animals were less likely to adjust their activity in the presence of a predator or after an unsuccessful predator strike.

“We’re saying that this is likely to make them more vulnerable to predation, whereby if they are missed by the first strike, they are more vulnerable and more likely to be detected for a second strike,” Mr Martin said.

Jake Martin
PhD student Jake Martin (Picture: David McAlpine)

Associate Professor Wong said researchers are only beginning to understand the impacts of pharmaceutical waste on evolution.

“By influencing reproductive behaviour, you can affect the number and the quality of offspring that are produced, which can then have important consequences for the health of populations and also the survival of species,” he said.

“At the moment, it’s not an issue which has captured enough attention. I don’t think it’s getting the attention from regulators as I think it deserves.”

“When we are potentially using wastewater to water our lawns, when we’re potentially talking about recycling water for human use, it does raise these kinds of alarming concerns about are we exposing ourselves unnecessarily to pharmaceutical pollutants and are we exposing our wildlife unnecessarily to pharmaceutical pollutants?”

The Wong group is now monitoring populations of fish exposed to fluoxetine over a longer period, to investigate the long-term effects of antidepressant exposure.

“I think that is really a key next step, which is to look at what are the longer terms impacts that exposure could have on wildlife,” Associate Professor Wong said.

“We want to see what impacts long-term exposure might have on these fish across multiple generations, so we’ll be looking at their behaviour, we’ll also be looking at various morphological traits, such as the colours of the males and various other things, to see what effects could occur across generations.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s